_________________________________________________________________ TODO LIST _________________________________________________________________ For more information on any of these issues, contact mercury@csse.unimelb.edu.au. mode analysis * fix various bugs in mode inference: need to fix it to work properly in the presence of functions; also need to change normalise_inst so that it handles complicated insts such as `list_skel(any)'. * extend the mode system to allow known aliasing. This is needed to make partially instantiated modes and unique modes work. [supported on the "alias" branch, but there were some serious performance problems... has not been merged back into the main branch] determinism analysis * add functionality for promise exclusive declarations: + add error checking and type checking as for assertions + include declaration information in the module_info + take into account mutual exclusivity from promise_exclusive and promise_exclusive_exhaustive declarations during switch detection + take into account exhaustiveness from promise_exhaustive and promise_exclusive_exhaustive declarations during determinism analysis unique modes * handle nested unique modes * we will probably need to extend unique modes a bit, in as-yet-unknown ways; need more experience here module system * check that the interface for a module is type-correct independently of any declarations or imports in the implementation section * there are some problems with nested modules (see the language reference manual) C interface * exporting things for manipulating Mercury types from C * need to deal with memory management issues code generation * take advantage of unique modes to do compile-time garbage collection and structure reuse. back-ends low-level (LLDS) back-end * support accurate garbage collection high-level C back-end * finish off support for accurate garbage collection; see the comments in compiler/ml_elim_nested.m * implement a better solution to the problem with abstract equivalence types defined as float (the current solution is to use --intermodule-optimization, but it would better to only do this for abstract equivalence types) * see also the comments in compiler/ml_code_gen.m native code back-end * support on platforms other than Linux/x86. * commit GCC tail-call improvements to GCC CVS repository * support `--gc accurate' * support `--gc none' .NET back-end * finish off standard library implementation * see also the TODO list in compiler/mlds_to_il.m Java back-end * implement the foreign language interface * finish off standard library implementation * see also the TODO list in compiler/mlds_to_java.m debugger * support back-ends other than LLDS * allow interactive queries to refer to values generated by the program being debugged * trace semidet unifications _________________________________________________________________ WISH LIST type-system * allow construct.construct/3 to work for existential types * remove limitation that higher-order terms are monomorphic. i.e. allow universal quantifiers at the top level of higher-order types, e.g. :- pred foo(all [T] pred(T)).. * constructor classes * allow a module exporting an abstract type to specify that other modules should not be allowed to test two values of that type for equality (similar to Ada's limited private types). This would be useful for e.g. sets represented as unordered lists with possible duplicates. [this is a subset of the functionality of type classes] * subtypes? * optimisation of type representation and manipulation (possibly profiler guided) * fold/unfolding of types mode analysis * split construct/deconstruct unifications into their atomic "micro-unification" pieces when necessary. (When is it necessary?) * extend polymorphic modes, e.g. to handle uniqueness polymorphism (some research issues?) * handle abstract insts in the same way abstract types are handled (a research issue - is this possible at all?) * implement `willbe(Inst)' insts, for parallelism * mode segments & high-level transformation of circularly moded programs. determinism analysis: * propagate information about bindings from the condition of an if-then-else to the else so that (if X = [] then .... else X = [A|As], ...) is considered det. * turn chains of if-then-elses into switchs where possible. [done by fjh, but not committed; zs not convinced that this is a good idea] higher-order preds: * implement single-use higher-order predicate modes. Single-use higher-order predicates would be allowed to bind curried arguments, and to have unique modes for curried arguments. * allow taking the address of a predicate with multiple modes * improve support for higher-order programming, eg. by providing operators in the standard library which do things like: + compose functions + take a predicate with one output argument and treat it like a function. ie. :- func (pred(T)) = T. module system: * produce warnings for implementation imports that are not needed * produce warnings for imports that are in the wrong place (in the interface instead of the implementation, and vice versa) [vice versa done by stayl] source-level transformations * more work on module system, separate compilation, and the multiple specialisation problem * transform non-tail-recursive predicates into tail-recursive form using accumulators. (This is already done, but not enabled by default since it can make some programs run much more slowly. More work is needed to only enable this optimization in cases when it will improve performance rather than pessimize it.) * improvements to deforestation / partial deduction code generation: * allow floating point fields of structures without boxing (need multi-word fields) * stack allocation of structures LLDS back-end: * use floating point registers * inter-procedural register allocation * other specializations, e.g. if argument is known to be bound to f(X,Y), then just pass X and Y in registers * reduce the overhead of higher-order predicate calls (avoid copying the real registers into the fake_reg array and back) * trim stack frames before making recursive calls, to minimize stack usage (this would probably be a pessimization much of the time - zs) and to minimize unnecessary garbage retention. * target C-- native code back-end * consider supporting exception handling in a manner that is compatible with C++ and Java * inline more of the standard library primitives that are currently implemented in C garbage collection * implement liveness-accurate GC * implement incremental GC * implement generational GC * implement parallel GC * implement real-time GC compilation speed * improve efficiency of the expansion of equivalence types (currently O(N^2)) (e.g. this is particularly bad when compiling live_vars.m). * improve efficiency of the module import handling (currently O(N^2)) * improve the efficiency of mode checking very large facts (e.g. this is particularly bad when compiling eliza.m). * use "store" rather than "map" for the major compiler data structures better diagnostics * optional warning for any implicit quantifiers whose scope is not the entire clause (the "John Lloyd" option :-). * give a better error message for the use of if-then without else. * give a better error message for the use of `<=' instead of `=<' (but how?) * give a better error message for type errors involving higher-order pred constants (requested by Bart Demoen) * give better error messages for syntax errors in lambda expressions general * coroutining and parallel versions of Mercury * implement streams (need coroutining at least) * implement a very fast turn-around bytecode compiler/interpreter/debugger, similar to Gofer [not-so-fast bytecode compiler done, but bytecode interpreter not implemented] * implement user-defined operators: Add a new construct `:- op(Pred, Type, Op).' as in Prolog; change prog_io.m to parse this construct and call io__op accordingly. But how does this fit in with the module system? * support for easier formal specification translation (eg a Z library, or Z to Mercury). * implement a source visualisation tool * distributed Mercury * improved development environment * additional software engineering tools + coverage analysis + automatic testing * literate Mercury * implement a GUI library (eg Hugs - Fudgets) * profiling guided optimisations + use profiling information to direct linker for optimal code placement (Alpha has a tool for this). * use of attribute grammar technology (including visit sequence optimization) to implement code with circular modes _________________________________________________________________ Last update was $Date: 2006-09-15 09:11:22 $ by $Author: juliensf $@cs.mu.oz.au.